Iberian Tankers Co. v. Gates Construction Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.
As appears from my previous opinion (369 F.Supp. 474) this is a mutual fault case not involving a collision. In other words, although the fault of both parties contributed to the accident, defendant was the only one against whom recovery could be had. In these circumstances I felt myself constrained by The Wright (2d Cir. 1940) 109 F.2d 699, 702 to grant pre-judgment interest despite my predisposition to do otherwise. 1 The Court of Appeals ruled that I had excessively limited the scope of my discretion, and remanded the matter for further…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shinko Boeki Co., Ltd. v. S.S. 'Pioneer Moon', Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and United States Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Iberian Tankers Company v. Gates Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Iberian Tankers Co. v. Gates Construction Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stephen T. Burns v. City of Des PeresCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Thomas v. Resort Health Related FacilityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981