Dunlavy v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Keolculo Distriet Court. Action to recovery for a personal injury. There was a trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
1. railroads: hrakenían ínOThigtrám: negligence of question0for jury-The plaintiff was employed by the defendant as a brakeman on a freight train. On the evening of the thirtieth of March, 1880, he fell from the train and was run over, and suffered the loss of an arm. The evidence tended to show that at the time of the ' . , , . ,. , acci(^ent he was engaged m uncoupling one part of the train from the other, the train being in motion; and, while so engaged, the conductor applied a brake, and so checked the motion of the train as to cause a violent jerk, and by reason thereof plaintiff fell…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Way v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
3Cited by11 opinions
- Whitsett v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Bell v. Incorporated Town of ClarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Mast v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
- Vance v. GroheSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- Burk v. Walsh & OltroggeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.