Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Short

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 12, 1956No. 14668Published

1DissentJames Alger Fee, Circuit Judge

There is no question here of any choice as matter of policy between James Harvey Short, individually and as Administrator of the deceased soldier on the one hand, and Margaret D. Short, Administratrix of the estate of Ethel G. Short, his mother. The Veterans Administration; as. a stakeholder, has unwarrantably weighted the scales in favor, of the former and against the latter. The agency has also unwarrantably taken a violent part in this litigation, in which, as a supposed stakeholder, it should have been neutral.

These actions were taken not in furtherance of justice, but in order to defend…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Short v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API