Legal Opinion

Pugh v. State

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided February 25, 2014No. 2012-CP-01899-COAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEE, C.J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. This appeal arises from the dismissal of a motion for modification of sentence. The trial court dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction because the term of court in which Ryan Quincy Pugh was sentenced had expired. Pugh now appeals, arguing (1) the trial court erred in dismissing his motion for lack of jurisdiction; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective; and (3) the trial court erred in sentencing him to supervised post-release supervision rather than unsupervised post-release supervision. While Pugh raises three issues on appeal, the only issue properly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2002
  2. Miss. Com'n of Jud. Perform. v. RussellMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Creel v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Payne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
  5. Small v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bradford Scott Byrd v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API