Crawford v. Laus
New York Supreme Court
Motion for an injunction pendente lite.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
While, from an inspection of the photographs of the parties’ respective places of business, it would seem that *249there is no such identity of appearance as would justify the granting of an injunction to restrain the maintenance of the defendant’s store in its present condition, I think that the motion should be granted to protect the plaintiff, pendente lite, from an infringement of his trade-mark, “ The Little Shop,” the question of his earlier adoption and advertisement of the name not being in dispute. The defendant’s chosen appellation, “ The Little Antique Shop,” as applied to a business…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chas. S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Cohn v. ReynoldsNew York Supreme Court · 1898
- Morgan v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fort Stanwix Canning Co. v. William McKinley Canning Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Ft. Stanwix Canning Co. v. William McKinley Canning Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900