Legal Opinion

Scott v. Department of Environmental Conservation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously confirmed, petition dismissed, without costs, and stay vacated. Memorandum: The record contains substantial evidence to support the determination that petitioners twice placed fill in the navigable water of Skaneateles Lake without a permit (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176; ECL 15-0505 [1]; 6 NYCRR 608.4).

The $7,500 civil penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offenses as to shock one’s sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233; Matter of Haz-O-Waste Corp. v Williams, 103 AD2d 1001;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Haz-O-Waste Corp. v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nieckoski v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Matter of Martin v. New York State Dept. of Envtl. ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  3. Matter of Stasack v. New York State Dept. of Envtl. ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API