Legal Opinion

York v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 2011No. 27A02-1008-CR-956Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

We granted this interlocutory appeal in anticipation of addressing appellant-defendant Harold E. York’s claim that the trial court should have granted his motion to dismiss the charge of Failure to Register as a Sex Offender, 1 a class D felony. York argues that changing the sex offender registration requirement from ten years to life is punitive and violates the prohibition against ex post facto laws.

Upon further reflection, we note that the charge against York was the result of his failure to register during the original ten-year period and his alleged failure to report…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. PollardIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API