Akron v. Northern Ohio Traction & L. Co.
Ohio Circuit Courts
Appeal from Summit common pleas court. The ordinance of 1899 terminated the rights of the company in that part of College street in question without renewing them. State v. Railway, 3 Circ. Dec. 471 (6 R. 318) ; People v. Railway, 126 N. Y. 29 [26 N. E. Rep. 961]; St. Glair Go. Tpk. Go. v. Illinois, 96 U. S. 63 [24 L. Ed. 651]; Goosaw Min. Go. v. South Carolina, 144 U. S. 550 [12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 689; 36 L. Ed. 537]; Hannibal & St. J. Ry. v. Packet Go. 125 U. S. 260 [8 Sup. Ct.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Summit common pleas court. The ordinance of 1899 terminated the rights of the company in that part of College street in question without renewing them. State v. Railway, 3 Circ. Dec. 471 (6 R. 318) ; People v. Railway, 126 N. Y. 29 [26 N. E. Rep. 961]; St. Glair Go. Tpk. Go. v. Illinois, 96 U. S. 63 [24 L. Ed. 651]; Goosaw Min. Go. v. South Carolina, 144 U. S. 550 [12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 689; 36 L. Ed. 537]; Hannibal & St. J. Ry. v. Packet Go. 125 U. S. 260 [8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 874; 31 L. Ed. 731]; Minium v. Larue, 64 U. S. (23 How.) 435 [16 L. Ed. 574]; Northwestern Fertilizing Go. v.…
1Opinion of the CourtWinch, J.
This action was brought to restrain the defendant from constructing a street railway on that part of College street in the city of Akron between Mill street and Market street.
From the petition it appears that on July 2, 1888, the council of the city of Akron granted to John S. Casement, his successors and assigns, a franchise for the period of twenty-five years to construct and operate a street railroad on certain streets in said city, including College street from Market street to Middlebury street, now known as Buehtel avenue, and that under said ordinance a street railroad was constructed…
2Cited by1 opinion
- STATE Ex FULTON v. CRUIKSHANKOhio Court of Appeals · 1935