Legal Opinion

Woods v. Polhemus

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1856PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAR from the Parke Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.

Petition for partition, filed by James S. Polhemus, the plaintiff below, in January, 1850. The *61petition represents that one Thomas Woods, late of Virginia, died seized of certain lands, describing them, situate in Parke and Monroe counties, Indiana. That Thomas Woods left as his heirs four children, viz., Theodore, Edgar, John Henry and Ann Eliza Woods; and his widow, Mary Woods, surviving him. That the petitioner, James 8. Polhemus, intermarried with Ann Eliza Woods in 1840.

It is further represented that on the 29th of March, 1847, the petitioner joined with his wife, Ann Eliza, in a' deed…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Lessee of PeirsolSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Hepburn v. DuboisSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  3. Dawson v. ShirleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1843

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
  2. Scranton v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Mattox v. HightshueIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Westhafer v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Thompson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API