Legal Opinion

Augusta Coach Co. v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1966No. 42087PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Franiojm, Judge.

1. It is fundamental that the burden of proof rests upon the plaintiff to establish a right to recover by proving all of the essential facts constituting a cause of action. Atlantic C. L. R. Co. v. Thomas, 83 Ga. App. 477 (1) (64 SE2d 301). It is equally fundamental that the jury may not base its verdict on mere guess or speculation, and that where proof of the plaintiff’s case is dependent upon circumstantial evidence, the circumstances must in some reasonable degree tend to preponderate in favor of inferences which establish the result claimed. Bentley v. Southern R. Co., 52…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  3. Ladson Motor Company v. CroftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. Hoffman v. National Surety Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Thomas v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Augusta Coach Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Brown & Stephens Pipe Line Contractors, Inc. v. ShippCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API