Legal Opinion

United States Steel Corporation v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1982No. 19-2096PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, Senior District Judge.

We are asked to review in this diversity action the district court’s application of the principle of “active interference” in resolving a dispute arising out of a contract between appellant, the Missouri Pacific Railroad (Mopac), and appellee, United States Steel. Mopac contracted with United States Steel’s American Bridge Division (ABD) for alteration of the superstructure of two Mopac railroad bridges which spanned the Arkansas River at Little Rock, Arkansas. The work was necessitated by development of the Arkansas River as a navigable stream pursuant to an act…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. E. C. Ernst, Inc. v. Manhattan Construction Company of Texas, Providence Hospital, Fairbanks-Morse, Inc., Charles H. McCauley Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. E. C. Ernst, Inc. v. Manhattan Construction Company of Texas, Providence Hospital, Fairbanks-Morse, Inc., Charles H. McCauley Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Clements Auto Co. v. Service Bureau Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Zachry Construction Corporation v. Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Electric MacHinery Enterprises, Inc. v. Hunt Construction Group, Inc. (In Re Electric MacHinery Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
  3. Net Construction, Inc. v. C & C Rehab & Construction, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Redondo Construction Corp. v. Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority (In re Redondo Construction Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
  5. Tricon Kent Co. v. Lafarge North America, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API