Legal Opinion

Cromartie v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 25, 2011No. SC09-1868Published

1Opinion of the Court

70 So.3d 559 (2011)

Carlos CROMARTIE, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. SC09-1868.

Supreme Court of Florida.

August 25, 2011.

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Natalie D. Kirk, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

Carlos Cromartie seeks review of the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Cromartie v. State, 16 So.3d 882 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), on the ground that it expressly and directly conflicts with Hannum v.…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Pariente; Concurrence · Pariente; Dissent; Concurrence · Polston.

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  3. Carratelli v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  4. Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  5. Hopkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API