Legal Opinion

Cowles v. Phares

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 11, 1983No. 82-511PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This appeal reflects procedural problems. Despite the fact this court earlier denied a motion to dismiss, we now determine that we do not have jurisdiction and do therefore, dismiss the appeal and cross appeal.

Shortly sketching, following a non-jury trial, the trial court orally announced a tentative, conditional ruling and required the future submission of an exhibit. No written final order or judgment has ever been entered or rendered. Sixty-two days after the oral announcement appellees moved for a new trial. It was granted and the trial court, in effect, reopened the case and required…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Miami Beach v. State Ex Rel. Pickin'Chicken of Lincoln Road, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  2. SCI, INC. v. Aneco Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Southern Laundry Co. of Marianna v. Home Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Giffen Industries, Inc. v. Duncan Plastering Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Phares v. CowlesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API