Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Bronfman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The causes of action for unjust enrichment and quantum meruit are barred by the applicable statute of frauds, General Obligations Law § 5-701 (a) (10). In relevant part, this enactment renders void any oral agreement “to pay compensation for services rendered in . . . negotiating the purchase ... of any . . . business opportunity.” (Id.) As is evident, the statute broadly applies to “any” business opportunity. The statute expressly defines the term “negotiating” and does so in the fol*394lowing broad terms: “ ‘Negotiating’ includes procuring an introduction to a party to the transaction or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Freedman v. Chemical Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Snyder v. BronfmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. At Last Naturals, Inc. v. FeinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API