Snyder v. Bronfman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The causes of action for unjust enrichment and quantum meruit are barred by the applicable statute of frauds, General Obligations Law § 5-701 (a) (10). In relevant part, this enactment renders void any oral agreement “to pay compensation for services rendered in . . . negotiating the purchase ... of any . . . business opportunity.” (Id.) As is evident, the statute broadly applies to “any” business opportunity. The statute expressly defines the term “negotiating” and does so in the fol*394lowing broad terms: “ ‘Negotiating’ includes procuring an introduction to a party to the transaction or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Freedman v. Chemical Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by2 opinions
- Snyder v. BronfmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- At Last Naturals, Inc. v. FeinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011