Legal Opinion

Town of Fairbanks v. Independent Meat Market

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided August 22, 1910No. 1486PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This is an action submitted to the court for its decision under the provisions of part 4, c. 28, of the Code of Alaska, on an agreed statement of facts. The statement of facts was subscribed and sworn to by A. J. Nordale, mayor of the town of Fairbanks, and H. E. Gardner, one of the defendants.

1Opinion of the Court

OVERFIEDD, District Judge.

The question here presented is whether defendants can be legally taxed by the town of Fairbanks on personal property which was admittedly without the corporate limits of the town on the date of the assessment, October 1, 1909.

The plaintiff would substantiate their right to so tax the personal property of the defendants in this case, beef cattle, under and by virtue of an ordinance regularly passed by the city council, which is in words and figures as follows:

“Be it ordained by the council of tbe town of Fairbanks, Alaska:
“Section 1. That all real property and the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Railroad Co. v. PenistonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Attorney General of CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. City of KodiakDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1955
  2. City of Kodiak v. ValtmanDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API