Legal Opinion

Diamond v. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 19, 2005No. 3D03-1206PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING and MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

2Per curiam

The opinion filed October 27, 2004 is withdrawn, and the following is substituted in its place.

We reverse the trial court’s order which struck The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Ct.’s proposal for settlement in an action by the Diamonds under a valuable items policy. See U.S. Security Ins. Co. v. Cahuasqui, 760 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), rev. dismissed, 796 So.2d 532 (Fla.2001)(The offer of judgment statute applies to all civil actions for damages.).

The motion for clarification is denied.

Reversed and remanded for further…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. US SEC. Ins. Co. v. CahuasquiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Cahuasqui v. U.S. Security Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schmitz v. SchmitzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API