In re the Probate of a Paper Writing Purporting to be the Last Will & Testament of Raisbeck
New York Surrogate's Court
Proceedings for the probate of a will.
1Opinion of the Court
Silkman, S.
Objection is made to the probate of the paper .propounded as the will of the decedent upon the alleged ground ■that the instrument was canceled by him in his lifetime. The facts are undisputed.
Samuel M. Raisbeck was an old gentleman, a lawyer by education, but who had not been in active business for many years. The paper propounded was properly executed on the 27th day ■of June, 1897, and is holographic; and, so far as it appears, no previous will had been made. The decedent had lived for about forty-five years as part of the household of Hr. Charles R. Dus•enbury, one of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Squiers v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- In re the Probate of a Paper Writing Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of HopkinsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blackford v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- In re the Probate of the Will of MacomberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
- In re the Estate of McCaffreyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
- In re the Estate of TremainNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of CollinsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.