Legal Opinion

Reich v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Myriam J. Altman, J.

Plaintiffs in two separate actions move by single motion for summary judgment. Defendants cross-move to reschedule the depositions of two nonparty witnesses.

Plaintiffs1 are the trustees of two trusts created by Dr. Sylvan Sacolick (Sacolick). They seek the proceeds of two life insurance policies issued by defendants on the life of Sacolick.

*936The threshold issue raised by defendants is whether Sacolick is actually dead. Defendants speculate that he is living abroad to evade arrest on an indictment which they allege was returned against him. Plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Brooklyn Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. In Re the Accounting of SchrauthNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Davis v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Reich v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API