Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miller v. City of Camden

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 18, 1900Published

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Dissent

Magie, Chancellor

(dissenting). Before March 24th, 1899, when the act entitled “An act providing for the annexation of the town of Stockton, in the county of Camden, and ■the territory embraced therein, to the city of Camden in said county,” was approved, the town of Stockton was regulated .as to its internal affairs by general laws.

The city of Camden was theretofore regulated as to its internal affairs by a special charter which had been enacted before the amended constitution had prohibited local and special legislation.

It does not admit of a question that on March 24th, 1899, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Dempsey v. Mayor of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API