Legal Opinion

Gray v. Natl. Bank of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1944No. 27877. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

On June 30, 1931, William H. Gray and Orpha Buckingham Gray, his wife, executed a note for $65,000 payable on demand to the First National Bank of Chicago. Other notes secured by first and second mortgages on four parcels of real estate owned by William H. Gray were delivered as collateral to the $65,000 note. Mrs. Gray died October 4, 1931, leaving a will, by which she devised to her sons, Ralph B. Gray and William B. Gray, and her daughter, Ina Gray Cook, in equal shares, a tract of land located in Woodford county. The $65,000 note was not paid, and on January 16, 1932, the bank filed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. WiltbergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Bonnell v. HoltIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. RenoIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Anderson v. HawheIllinois Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Chmielewski v. MarichIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Zych v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Meldoc Properties v. PrezellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Parkway Bank and Trust Company v. KorzenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  5. Lydon v. Eagle Food Centers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API