Legal Opinion

Jarchin v. Rubin

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 15, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Judgments unanimously reversed upon the law, with fifteen dollars costs in each case to appellant, and complaints dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.

A landlord is not hable in damages for injuries received by a tenant because of a failure to make repairs in the leased premises even though the landlord has agreed to make them. (Boden v. Scholtz, 101 App. Div. 1; Kushes v. Ginsberg, 99 id. 417.) This rule, however, is not applicable in the case of tenement houses, where, because of the provisions of the Tenement House Law, the landlord may be held- (Altz v. Leiberson, 233 N.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Altz v. . LeibersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Wynne v. HaightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Boden v. ScholtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Marston v. FrisbieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  5. Lipschitz v. RapaportAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goldberg v. EngelhardCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API