Legal Opinion
Town of Kentwood v. Kent
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 28, 1918No. 22921Published
Chas. A. Kent, Jr., was convicted in the may- or’s court of the Town of Kentwood, and he appeals, and, a motion to dismiss the appeal hav; ing been overruled, the town prays for certiorari and mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtMonroe, C. J.
The question here presented is the same as that which has been this day decided in the case of Town of Kentwood v. D. A. Fendlason, 77 South. 785,1 No. 22920 of our docket; and, for the reasons assigned in the opinion therein handed down:
It. is ordered that the judgment herein complained of be set aside, the rule to dismiss the appeal reinstated and disposed of in accordance with the views expressed in that opinion and the law, and that the defendant herein pay the costs of this proceeding.
Ante, p. 902.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Town of Kentwood v. FendlasonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918