Legal Opinion
Badillo v. Central Steel & Wire Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 25, 1980No. 79 C 2122PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Defendant Central Steel & Wire Co. (“Central”) has moved in the alternative to dismiss the Amended Complaint 1 filed by plaintiff George Badillo (“Badillo”) or to strike various of the Amended Complaint’s allegations. For the reasons stated in this opinion and order, Central’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Facts
In January 1977 Badillo filed a Charge of Discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the “EEOC”) claiming that his discharge by Central had been unlawfully based on Badillo’s national origin. On March 17, 1979…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Resnick v. American Dental Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
- 33 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1497, 33 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1883, 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,984 Alfred Ekanem v. The Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Georgene PASKULY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARSHALL FIELD & COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Ekanem v. Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Fields v. Village of SkokieDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.