Legal Opinion

United States v. Carmelita Yago

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 4, 1997No. 96-10493Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

122 F.3d 1076

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Carmelita YAGO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-10493.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted August 15, 1997.

Decided Sept. 4, 1997.

1

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, Helen Gillmor, District Judge, Presiding.

2

Before:…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. David J. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Alexander E. MarabellesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Roger v. ChastainCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States of America, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Luisa Ward, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API