Legal Opinion

Hamer v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided May 2, 2025No. 5:24-cv-00059Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION STACY HAMER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 5:24-cv-0059-LCB ) SOCIAL SECURITY ) ADMINISTRATION, ) Commissioner, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On January 1, 2024, the Claimant, Stacy Hamer, who alleges disability due to debilitating back pain, filed a complaint seeking judicial review of an adverse decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“the Commissioner”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Doc. 1. The Commissioner filed an answer and a copy of the administrative record…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Winschel v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Jack Bloodsworth v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API