Legal Opinion

United States v. Gray

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided October 28, 1982No. SPCM 16785PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FOREMAN, Judge:

In accordance with his pleas, the appellant was convicted of wrongful appropriation of an automobile, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921 (1976). He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for three months, and forfeiture of $300.00 pay per month for six months. The convening authority approved the sentence, but suspended the confinement at hard labor in excess of two months for a period of twelve months.

The appellant contends that the military judge erred by denying the appellant’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. SchullerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. CuttingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  4. United States v. EngleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  5. United States v. CallahanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. SimpsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. GavittU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. ReedU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API