Legal Opinion
Rafael M. Bertucelli v. Gerald F. Carreras, Rafael M. Bertucelli v. Gerald F. Carreras
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 8, 1972No. 25230, 26830PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
Bertucelli appeals from the District Court’s dismissal of his action seeking redress under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 for alleged infringements of his civil rights. 1 He advances numerous grounds for reversal. At this time, however, we need consider only one, for we believe Bertucelli correctly contends that he was wrongfully denied an opportunity to amend his complaint before the action was dismissed.
The District Court dismissed the action for two reasons, only one of which is now of importance. Upon defendants’ motions, it had ordered Bertucelli’s complaint stricken because it did not comply…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carroll v. Morrison Hotel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- William T. Griffin, Patrick M. McGinnis C. Newton Kidd and Caroll Rosenbloom v. George D. LockeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Sherman H. Skolnick v. Albert E. Hallett and Harry G. FinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
3Cited by20 opinions
- Salahuddin v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Salahuddin v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Roger Asay v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Perington Wholesale, Inc. v. Burger King Corporation, Davmor Industries, Inc., and Carpenter Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.