Legal Opinion

Dorazio v. Davis

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 25, 1984No. CA 84-146PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The plaintiff, Nettie Pauline Dortch Davis, and the defendant, Virginia Dorazio, are sisters who are tenants in common of certain lands inherited from their father, Robert L. Dortch. In August, 1978, Mrs. Davis brought this partition suit in the Lonoke Chancery Court with regard to 110 acres of the common property, the complaint alleging that the land could not be divided in kind and asking that it be sold. Mrs. Dorazio’s answer admitted the cotenancy but asserted that the parties were in such unequal bargaining positions that a partition by sale would be oppressive.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schnitt v. McKellarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Holiday Inns, Inc. v. DrewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Ward v. PipkinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Hollaway v. Pocahontas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Looney v. LooneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Bell v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Rigsby v. RigsbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API