Legal Opinion

Schoenbeck v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1956No. 27833PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The former opinion delivered in this case is withdrawn and the following substituted therefor:

This is a conviction for theft, with punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

This case was submitted to the jury upon the theory of theft by false pretext, as denounced by Art. 1413, P. C., which reads as follows:

“The taking must be wrongful, so1 that if the property came into the possession of the person accused of theft by lawful means, the subsequent appropriation of it is not theft, but if the taking, though originally lawful, was obtained by any false pretext, or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Redding v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. Massey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Black and Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Montgomery Fly Cameron v. W. B. Hauck, Sheriff of Bexar County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Finley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Byrd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API