Legal Opinion
David Gould v. Hyundai Motor Company
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 3, 2025No. 8:23-cv-01344Unknown
1Opinion
O UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DAVID GOULD; Case No. 8:23-cv-01344-JWH-DFM KAUSHIK IYENGAR; BRENDON LOBO; JOHN NIXON; ORDER GRANTING JANE CHANG BRIGHT; DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO SHANE MAHON; COMPEL ARBITRATION [ECF PETER CONHEIM; and No. 29 and 32] KINGSLEY BARNIE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY; HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA; KIA CORPORATION; KIA AMERICA, INC.; GENESIS MOTOR, LLC; and GENESIS MOTOR AMERICA LLC, Defendants. I. SUMMARY OF DECISION Before the Court are two motions: e the motion of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.