Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Guillemard

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 5, 1926No. 1838PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal taken in an interference proceeding, relating to an invention of a certain chemical mixture or compound designed for use in a respiratory apparatus for protection against deleterious gases. The interference involves an application of Guillemard, filed May 14, 1920, and a patent granted to Lamb and Hoover on November 4,1919, on an application filed by them on December 28, 1918 Guillemard, who is a Prench citizien, claimed that he had filed an application for a corresponding patent in Prance on October 3, 1917, and that under section 4887, Rev. St. (Comp.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guettler v. AlfsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Kling v. HaringDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1926
  3. Owen v. HeimannCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
  4. Seror v. DickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
  2. Chemical Foundation, Inc. v. General Aniline Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  3. Chemical Foundation, Inc. v. General Aniline Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API