Legal Opinion · Dissent

Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Brown

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2011No. 49S02-1106-CT-388Published

1DissentShepard, Chief Justice

For reasons explained in my dissent in McCabe v. Comm’r, Ind. Dep’t of Ins., I think the majority wrongly holds in this case that attorney fees are a separate element of recovery under the Adult Wrongful Death Statute.

In this case, the Court goes beyond the McCabe holding, declaring that a surviving parent may recover for “loss of services” that the deceased adult child would have rendered.

The common law rule, still a principle of background law, held that there was not a legal obligation for a child to support his or her parent. Haskamp v. Swenger, 85 Ind.App. 255, 153 N.E. 815 (1926).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New York Cent. RR Co. v. JOHNSON, ADMX., ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Haskamp v. SwengerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API