Legal Opinion
In Re Klein
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 22, 1934No. 3525, 3540PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNokdbye, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The sufficiency of the first objection urged by the insurance company must be determined in light of subsections (n) and (o) of section 75 (11 USCA § 203 (n, o), Agricultural Compositions and Extensions. These two subsections read as follows:
“(n) The filing of a petition pleading for relief under this section shall subject the farmer and his property, wherever located, to the exclusive jurisdiction of the court. In proceedings under-this section, except as otherwise provided herein, the jurisdiction and powers of the court, the title, powers, and duties of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Brine v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- McGoon v. ScalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- United States v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Clark v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Johnson v. First National Bank Of MontevideoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Johnson v. First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Moratzka v. Lanesboro State Bank (In Re Johnson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
- Ecklund & Swedlund Development Corp. v. Hennepin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re Ecklund & Swedlund Development Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
- Bradford v. FaheyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.