Legal Opinion
Harvey Taylor v. Thomas McCune Slick, Individually and as of the Estate of Dorothy M. Ballantine, Deceased
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 2, 1999No. 98-3341PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
We are to determine whether the continuation of a sheriffs sale, following the filing of a bankruptcy petition, violates the automatic stay provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a), and whether a Pennsylvania rule of civil procedure that permits oral notice of the continuation and rescheduled sale date is sufficient to protect a debtor’s due process rights. The bankruptcy court held that the postponement of the sale of property owned by the debtor, Harvey Taylor, did not violate § 362(a) and that Taylor’s due process rights had not been violated by a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Chemetron Corporation v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Hart v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Hart)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- Worthy v. World Wide Financial Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- St. Clair v. Beneficial Mortgage Co. (In Re St. Clair)District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- In re SoppickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Joy Denby-Peterson v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.