Legal Opinion · Dissent

Leroy Warren Kinchen, and North-West Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 18, 1982No. 81-3262Published

1DissentTate, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent insofar as the majority holds that the plaintiff Kinchen was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. With great respect for the able trial judge and for my esteemed colleagues of the majority, the upholding of the directed verdict and the depriving of the jury of its function to determine this factual question are in contravention of the principles of Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1969), quoted but ignored by the majority.

In substance, the majority accepts the facts relied upon by Kinchen: The train (a locomotive and four carbon-black cars) backed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Smolinski v. TaulliSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  3. Reeves v. Louisiana and Arkansas Railway CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  4. Odom v. HooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  5. Lionel Burdis v. The Texas & Pacific Railway Company, Commercial Union Insurance Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API