Legal Opinion

Harold Chakales Linda Carol Chakales v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 27, 1996No. 95-1742PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARZER, District Judge.

Taxpayers Harold and Linda Carol Cha-kales (“Chakales”) appeal from a decision of the United States Tax Court upholding the assessment of penalty interest by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Harold Chakales and Linda Carol Chakales v. Commissioner, 68 T.C.M. (CCH) 479, 1994 WL 454539 (1994). We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a) and affirm.

BACKGROUND

Chakales was among several thousand taxpayers who participated in a program operated by First Western Government Securities (“First Western”) involving straddle transactions of forward contracts to buy and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Freytag v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  5. Rybak v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Duffie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. Reko v. Creative Promotions, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  3. James B. Thomas, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Zachary H. Sacks and Salley Sacks v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of BentonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API