Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1992No. 19048Published

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Judge.

Robert Harold Thompson appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence which was obtained by execution of a search warrant, and from various evidentiary rulings during Thompson’s trial on grand theft charges. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

Thompson was charged by information with three felony counts of grand theft by possession, I.C. §§ 18-2403(4), 18-2407. He filed a motion to suppress the evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant on the basis that the officers willfully misled the magistrate in presenting information and omitting…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Lance DozierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. State v. LindnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Fuller v. WoltersIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API