H. T. Cottam & Co. v. Moises

*253H. T. Cottam & Co., Appellant vs Abraham Moises

To. 791?.

Appeal from Civil District Court, Kan. Fred D. King, Judge.

CHAHL3S 7. CLAIB0RF7, JUDO’S.

Plaintiffs 30ld defendant a lot of merchandise; defen-isnt refused to accept delivery of them; plaintiffs sold then at a price less than the price for which they sold to defendant, cr.d r.ow sue defendant to recover the difference.

Plaintiffs alleged that between Isay 3d and June 25th, 1919, they sold to the defendant certain merchandise and incurred certain charcos detailed in the itemized statement annexed for -«Rich a charge of $13 30.78 was made;…