Legal Opinion

Mills v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 28, 1987No. Nos. 85-1262, 85-1280PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

Glynda Randel Mills brought this diversity suit in Oklahoma against her former husband, Jack L. Randel, and Randel’s insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, to recover damages for injuries she sustained in an automobile accident in which Randel was the driver. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict of $125,000 in favor of Mills and against State Farm.1 The trial court reduced the award by $44,734.68, an amount that State Farm had already paid to Mills pursuant to the personal injury protection (PIP) provisions of Randel’s policy.

On…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Miller v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Bounds v. CaudleTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Brickner v. GoodenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  5. Schwartz v. SchwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mills v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API