Legal Opinion

Lacey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 6, 1994No. CR-92-1841Published

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLAN, Judge.

The appellant, Willie Lacey, an inmate, was found guilty following a disciplinary hearing of violating Rule 90, i.e., consuming, using, or being under the influence of alcohol, narcotics, or another intoxicant. The record indicates that the appellant was directed to provide a correctional officer with a urine specimen, which tested positive for cocaine. The appellant was then served with a notice of pending disciplinary action, and he requested no witnesses. At the disciplinary hearing, the arresting officer and the appellant testified. The appellant was found guilty as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ex Parte KuenzelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Richard W. Spence v. Hal FarrierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  4. Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Herman Harmon v. Calvin D. Auger, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API