Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 7, 2004No. SC04-100Published

1ConcurrenceWells, J.

I concur in the adoption of the proposed rules. I write to state that I join in the change to rule 3.191(a) (Speedy Trial without Demand) only because it is necessary to conform the rule to this Court’s majority opinions. However, I continue to ad*201here to my opinion expressed in State v. Williams, 791 So.2d 1088, 1092 (Fla.2001).

The majority’s decision in Williams, reinforcing Genden v. Fuller, 648 So.2d 1183 (Fla.1994), was against the expressed views of the unanimous district court panel in Williams v. State, 774 So.2d 23, 24 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Moreover, I reiterate that making the speedy…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. MancinoSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. Muhammad v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. Larzelere v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  4. Troupe v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  5. Cheshire v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API