Legal Opinion

State v. Eggert

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1993No. 9226SC619Published

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court committed reversible error by excluding hearsay statements allegedly made by Mr. Burton to Mr. Malezewski and by Mr. Burton to the defendant. Specifically, defendant argues that Mr. Burton made statements admitting that the LSD found in the box underneath the defendant was his and that his statements were admissible as statements made against his penal interests under G.S. 8C-1, Rule 804(b)(3).

“G.S. 8C-1, Rule 804(b)(3) provides that, if the declarant is not available as a witness, statements against the declarant’s interest…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Neville v. Appellate DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. LevanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API