People v. Manning
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.—
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant Gary Lynn Manning appeals from his conviction of battery on an institutionalized victim (Pen. Code, 1 § 243.4, subd. (b)). He contends the trial court erred in (1) admitting evidence of defendant’s prior sexual offenses; (2) excluding expert testimony on the meaning of a People v. West 2 plea; and (3) failing to give a limiting instruction as to the victim’s fresh complaint. We find no error, and we affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Current Offense
On October 17, 2003, Jane Doe No. 1 had knee surgery at Arrowhead Regional…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. Wall (Randall)California Supreme Court · 2017
- (HC) Griffin v. MartinezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- P. v. Gastineau CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. Balch CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.