Legal Opinion

Reagin v. Stroud

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1935No. 24664PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

The defendant in a pending tort action, who was personally served with notice and subpoena to appear before a commissioner and be examined by the plaintiff under the provisions of sections 38-2301 et seq. of the Code of 1933, refused to appear in response thereto. Plaintiff filed her written motion in the trial court setting up the facts as to such refusal, and prayed that the defendant be required to appear and be examined on a day certain, or in default thereof that his plea and answer filed in the case be stricken. A rule nisi was issued on this motion. Tlie defendant demurred thereto, and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Turner v. CampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Ray v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Mathews v. RountreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Baldwin v. LoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Webb v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  2. Personal Credit Corporation v. GoldwireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  3. SOUTHERN GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Overstreet v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API