Legal Opinion

Chambers v. North American Accident Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1925No. 25,904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an a-ction to reform a policy of accident insurance and to recover thereon as reformed.

Plaintiff’s evidence tended to prove that on or about June 12, 1922, defendant’s agent, J. C. Salisbury, called on plaintiff and his partner, W. H. (Pete) Hill, at Arkansas City. Plaintiff and Hill were young men just out of the army and were aviators and parachute jumpers. They made their temporary headquarters at the garage of Art Hill, a brother of W. H. Hill. Plaintiff’s agent, Salisbury, solicited their applications for insurance. Hill said:…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pfiester v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Preferred Accident Insurance v. StoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  3. Priest v. Kansas City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. Nichols v. Commonwealth Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Palin v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Field v. Missouri Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Stewart v. Commonwealth Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. Hunley v. Union InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API