Legal Opinion

Houck v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 3, 1999No. 98-2290Published

1Per curiam

James N. Houck alleged twenty separate grounds for relief in a motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court denied the motion without attaching portions of the record conclusively refuting all allegations and we reversed and remanded for portions of the record to be attached, or for an evidentiary hearing to be held. See Houck v. State, 704 So.2d 605 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). On remand the trial court again denied the motion and attached portions of the record.

We affirm the denial of relief on nineteen grounds on the basis of the attached record or the facial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Graham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Houck v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API