Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Furth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1901No. 3359PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. E. D. Benson, Judge.

1Per curiam

In December, 1893, and for some time prior thereto, Alfred Mosher, Sr., Alfred Mosher, Jr., and W. A. McDonald composed a partnership doing business under the firm name and style of Mosher & McDonald. The business of the firm was mainly confined to logging in the state of Washington, and was conducted upon a somewhat extensive scale. The two Moshers resided at Bay City, in the state of Michigan; and McDonald,, the remaining member of the firm, resided in the state of Washington, and was charged with the immediate management and control of the details of the firm’s business, —the principal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Decker v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Arnold v. Suffolk BankNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Northern Pac. R. v. HeflinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
  4. Wilder v. City of New OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1898
  5. Denny v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Trustees of the New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Emory v. FaithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  3. Armstrong v. Louisiana Ice & Utilities, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  4. State v. Western State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API