Legal Opinion
Coppe Healthcare Solutions Inc v. BrightSky LLC
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided September 20, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00088Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN COPPE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 24-CV-88 BRIGHTSKY, LLC, and AT&T ENTERPRISES, LLC, Defendant, NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, Intervenor. DECISION AND ORDER Nautilus Insurance Company seeks a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify AT&T Enterprises, LLC1 with respect to AT&T’s dispute with Coppe Healthcare Solution, Inc. (ECF No. 39.) AT&T argues that Nautilus’s claim for a declaration that it has no duty to indemnify AT&T is not ripe, and therefore it seeks to dismiss that claim. (ECF No. 46.)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bankers Trust Company, Cross-Appellee v. Old Republic Insurance Company, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Lear Corporation v. Johnson Electric Holdings Limited and Nevada Bond Investment Corp. IICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.