Legal Opinion

Rosenbloom v. Great American Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 13, 1939Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

The question we are called upon to decide is whether plaintiff, under his policy with defendant, is entitled to recover from the latter the moneys which he was obliged to pay in order to satisfy a judgment which a servant in his household had recovered against him under our Workmen’s Compensation law. In other words, is that servant covered by the policy?

The answer to the question requires a construction of the policy. The facts are stipulated. Erom the record as submitted, we learn that on July 17th, 1937, defendant issued to plaintiff its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Solly Church v. Consolidated Indemnity & InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Stefanik v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  3. Central Surety & Insurance v. GeirskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API