Legal Opinion

Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. Muhle

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 31, 1953No. 14852_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLET, Circuit Judge.

Fred J. Muhle recovered a judgment for $7,175.00 against the defendant insurance company on an insurance policy covering loss to his farm buildings from windstorm. The policy provided that the defendant should not be liable—

“ * * * for loss caused directly or indirectly by (a) frost or cold weather or (b) ice (other than hail), snowstorm, tidal wave, high water or overflow, whether driven by wind or not.”

The defense was that the insured’s damage was caused either entirely by flood water or by flood water driven by wind and hence was not covered by the policy. Mr. Muhle…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kimmie v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Partello v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. State Ex Rel. Trading Post Co. v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  4. Newark Trust Co. v. Agricultural Ins.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
  5. National Fire Insurance v. CrutchfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Franklin v. SheltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  2. Hart-Bartlett-Sturtevant Grain Co. v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. New York Life Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Joyce A. HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  4. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Douglas A. Smart, Jr., Douglas A. Smart, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
  5. Moran Towing Corp. v. M. A. Gammino Construction Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API